First Phase: 1978-1984
The first important step during
this initial period was to allow the managers of the State Owned Enterprises
(SOEs) increased, albeit still greatly limited, autonomy. They just had a
little more say in the allocation of the SOEs profits, as well as their
production targets.
I think that a brilliant innovation
by the Chinese government during this time was their dual-pricing system.
Here’s an example to illustrate how it basically worked. Lets say we’re running
a TV factory; the Man has given us a certain production quota we must meet, and
the TVs within that quota must be sold at a certain price. If we produced any
TVs above and beyond that quota, however, we were free to sell them at whatever
price we wished, or in other words, the market price. This sort of system
allowed for a relatively smooth transition from planned prices to market-based
prices.
Second Phase: 1985-1993
During this time, further
independence was granted to the SOEs—the idea was to transition them into
independent economic entities. Additionally, private business flourished; their
comparative efficiency revealed the weakness of SOEs.
One problem during this time came
as a result of the “contract responsibility system.” Under this system,
managers signed 3-5 year contracts with the relevant government agencies, and
simply reported to them; this was good because it further separated the actual
management of the SOEs from the ownership of the government. However with such
short contracts, firms tended to be overly focused on short-term goals rather
than long-term.
Other big steps during this time
was the expansion of shareholding companies, as well as the listing of large
SOEs on the stock market, allowing them access to external sources of funding.
Third Phase: 1993-Present
During this phase, the reform goal
became setting up a Modern Enterprises System, or in other words, transforming
SOEs into modern corporations. This can be further explained by a series of
catch phrases:
“Do some things, leave some things
undone,” “Some develop and some recede,” and “Manage large enterprises while
easing control over smaller ones.” As can be gathered from these slogans, the
general idea was for the government to focus on the large, strategic,
industries, while leaving everything else to the market—to put some numbers to
it, the government is focusing on the top 1000 SOE’s which account for about 40%
of total assets in the economy. For example, currently power and cell service
is provided through the state, while clothes and dining are not.
From 1993 on, economic reforms were
much more systematic and fundamental. They have also been extensive, including
reforms in property rights, SOEs, factor markets, prices, goods distribution,
social security, foreign trade, and government functions.
Privatization also commenced on a
mass scale during 1995; by the following year, over half of small SOE’s had
been privatized.
Result?
Over this time period, from 1978
until this minute, China has averaged a 9.8% annual growth rate. It is
absolutely unreal how well these policies have worked.
Moving forward, there has been much
speculation that perhaps China’s growth is about to hit a plateau. This is of
course more than possible, but in my opinion my current host country has quite
a bit of “easy” development left in it, for the following reason: it seems that
most of their growth has come from a combination of privatizing SOE’s and
liberalizing those that the government retained control over. The privatized
companies have been flourishing, while the liberalized SOE’s are doing better.
In spite of this however, the SOE’s performance is lackluster compared to their
privatized counterparts; The Economist had an article about this recently, how
SOE’s overall performance has been unimpressive at best. I think that if they
stay the course, if the government stays disciplined in it’s pattern of letting
control of their own economy go, then China will continue growing spectacularly
for many years yet.
(Source: Professor Mao Zhongming)
(Source: Professor Mao Zhongming)
No comments:
Post a Comment